In the thunder box display case in German history: the Leech
After Düsseldorf Parteienrechtler Martin Morlok (SPIEGEL 33/2009) now also criticized (Spiegel Online by today), the former Federal Constitutional Court Hans Hugo Klein processes at the Federal Election Commission, particularly the federal election manager. Especially in the case of the Pauli party says former CDU member of parliament Klein, "counters the approach of the Committee considerable doubt." At least, so small, you were here "at the approval of the party really needed to be done in generosity and need." For Klein, who was at the Federal Constitutional Court is responsible for party right, holds the handling of Pauli "threats to the validity of the election." In plain language this means that an election challenge Paulis could be quite successful. In the worst case, should the election be repeated.
The proxy signatures on behalf of were lawful. Because Paul had ever sign himself? The Law is the word "shall" and not "must." After the federal election law Pauli had even after the deadline may still sign, namely, if, despite the lack of signature of the nomination "in itself" was valid. The Counterfeiters democratic electoral laws with the Federal Returning Officer at the top (but the President has just said ...) now know that legal facts will prevail. Your abgekatertes false match has been discovered. They have lost. You know it long enough before the election and must be the consequences if their decision is still not corrected in time, who in person.
The Federal Election Director of the Wiesbaden Statistical federal service listened to the wax figures-cabinet, I had written on 7/Aug/2009 and came so obviously going on a small avalanche that was judgment security as usual. Mr. Leech is one of a waxworks display case in front of the wooden beam German statistics. So I repeat: The federal election is now invalid, unless the "Free Union" would be permitted to continue in Bavaria for the full selection.
_____________________
Addendum
The events come thick and formal. Just reported in Spiegel Online, just hours after my essay above:
Berlin - Gabriele Pauli is on the offensive: The Free Union of former CSU politician wants to achieve with an emergency petition with the Federal Constitutional Court still their registration for the parliamentary elections. A request was prepared and submitted to the court on Wednesday said the counsel and the Bavarian state leader of the party, Oliver Schmidl, "the newspaper. According to the court might decide Schmidl later this week about the case.
A good step! I keep my fingers crossed.
_____________________
Addendum 18/Aug/2009 at 1:30 +1
The chances of an emergency petition from the perspective of the former constitutional judge in a recently published small interview.
based courts "inhumane systems," if they block as a result of conflicting laws on the backs of people seeking help. Even the Federal Constitutional Court could thus reached an impasse, I do not think I trust very senior judges.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: The Free Union has lodged an urgent application to the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. Could Gabriele Pauli they succeed?
Klein: Yes. The Court has recently re-affirmed that there is legal protection against decisions of the Federal Election Commission until after the election - with the rejection of an emergency petition by the horror. In this case law is not to quibble.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is that your opinion, right?
Klein: The legislature could and should change because I believe something. On such issues must also be an expeditious procedure possible before the election. The certainty that no one wants in retrospect because of such error, a redial, but it is, which leads to that the Federal Election Commission apparently feels so carefree.
The Federal Constitutional Court has often assumed the role of a citizen-advocate, it is unfortunately not an official organ. It has revealed dictatorial tendencies and protect the citizens. With the application of the "Free Voters" is the object of the court, a legislative gap that has been shamelessly exploited, with higher-level laws to fill. It may not be that the cat bites because once he has formed a brittle solid position in the tail and wrong is committed by the supreme court.
The case is legally so clear that a judicial hearing, which would postpone to justify the choice, not need. The help-seeking party has the legal protection already, as are not addressed to a "decision" of the Federal Electoral Committee must, but against a glaring mistake that is not valid. If a determination is not a mandatory provision that would extend Mr. Klein so much that concept also.
A target statement is always an "if" statement. We do not have a dictatorship in which case the violation is an imperative-like transformed into a death penalty. We live in a democracy, not even the concept of national "Unity" in the national anthem and understands that in the Nazi era is back, in which the law was stretched due dictated unity. But whether we live in a democracy or a disguised bureaucratic party selection Auser-elected dictatorship that is to precisely indicate a choice.
It is not acceptable that a crony gang trample on basic fundamental rights of citizens and can hit the highest German court in a calculated trick.
Actually, it's not about party approvals of all three candidates, but for violations of competition law that have led to an illegal refusal. Mr. Klein did so, as if we were still in a legal space. But we're already in a legal vacuum in which the electoral law has been abused by the returning officer himself. The case is a case for police and prosecutors.
only every four years, the German illusion of being able to make democracy by choosing to go to the polls. They feel, at least on this one days, used to be popular and respected. They know or expect that they will be manipulated in all the other days. But now it is about this one day: HE WILL NOW ALSO MANIPULATED. The ax chops the roots of democracy - and the highest German court to help you.
The forces of division, Gerichtbarkeit for the device under the wheel when the legislature is almost worshiped. He produced continuously laws for maintaining power, party dominance, diffuse recovery of tax revenues, more and more administration, more paternalism of the citizens, more and more laws and regulations forced levies. He even produced out of their own ministries, which are overloaded with lawyers. Will keep the third power, the Gerichtbarkeit, reasonably objective standards, not again slide into relative right as once in, they will also question the legislation. You may by the contradictions in the Constitution be uncovered.
Two of my children living in Munich want to choose the Free Union. I therefore call on the Constitutional Court to vacate the vile and criminal artificial barrier has an invalid decision, a wrong decision, away. I urge the prosecutor to proceed against the masters, because it's not just about votes, but also significant inputs, sacrifice and investment by small parties.
satirical parodies are pretty well placed to explain events in addition visually. A path to autobiographical satire Humor, as it once was Clovis Poth, I am also still . Most people read not as much as before. Not protest, rather than readers of these lines, it just is. They look better on images that you save to read. From time to view the remains, however, adhere to texts which contain rhymes. The bedtime poem of childhood beat by then. Bold exclamation mark above and do not act as smart as approximate rhymes in a poem. Therefore I repeat the eight-liner from 4/Juli/09. The disfiguring plastic surgeon with a scalpel to the constitution and electoral law it sing to the tune of National Anthem:
Unity and justice and hamfor the German fatherland!Let's election Cattle citizens leftbrotherly with heart and hand!unity, justice and lyingare the pledge of fortune;fixed just let us cheat,flourish, then you country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment