"Federal President" Wulff would also love to free. But he is caught in the Merkel-scrub. He has, as it were entangled in their slap-hairstyle. Is it washed, it must Wulff change his shirt, it will blow dried, it follows from his small light.
Addendum 11/Sept/10 Meanwhile the Federal Presidential Office on the glorious idea of a sort came bribery that has been "threaded",
1000 € more pension to Sarrazin's voluntary withdrawal from office as Federal bankers. I doubt that this is a legal basis, since tax money is involved, the money is not paid out of pocket of the President. Normally be entitled to tax dollars not to bribes of any kind are used.
The "bribe money" apparently was adopted, not donated to charity. Or - another possibility - for the study of Islam. The wood is cut from the Sarrazin is the top civil servant already mentioned wood that takes such money. Sarrazin a party? No, this requires a completely different character traits. It will not be given.
Dear Readers!
, allow me to ask where I was to push the small difference between self and state officials in between. I would really like to express that abound Bundestag, Federal and state parliaments. They are full power of their property, almost exclusively composed of non-self, the self- have never ventured in life. A related concern is a kind of schizophrenia, a divided life, one is hiding, intangible glass surface, a kind of aloofness, for everything from crashes, a kind Nichtansprechbarkeit, because nothing, absolutely nothing will be taken seriously except the little calculation to oneself, except publicity, in order to give an appearance. But this is not the point. The point is different, and this is my conclusion: We live in a decadent state, and this proliferates and expands by proliferating fees and indirect taxes, about 100 € for a card, 40 € for a certification stamp etc . because of unfair laws that have been created to rip-offs - At the expense of the self. The Independent pays three times, once the taxes should itself from them, such services can be actually worn. Then, the rip-off even then, the cannot. The free economy would be ashamed, would find no buyers, would not be competitive. The monopolistic decadent state exploits the fact that laws can be palmed to ripping off because hardly anyone can resist whom it may concern. The gentlemen with the luxurious accommodation of taxpayers' money to defend himself. You have enough. But the bulk of the population is made more financially accessible through the wringer - and can not defend themselves, except on election day. Then missing But the party that Sarrazin is unable to start.
This just described decadent state has a president, ultimately making the bribery of tax dollars feed. The decadent thing is that nobody seems to complain. How could this happen at all? Wulff would like Merkel, sought a solution in their favor, the staff of the Chairman's Office want to please her new boss and found to be a "solution". Wulff seems pretty cowardly now vorzuschieben his official staff, reveals how the Spiegel article linked above. Not he, but they found the way out. Why this is so completely wrong, why this kind of bribery? Why does the Federal President hide behind his staff and staff do not take the responsibility? It took
models. For solutions was money - ransom - paid. In abduction, with pirates. Sarrazin both are not, however, the model was applied, the ransom provided for criminals. The success in ransom payments have now the "success" guaranteed even with Sarrazin. The result was simply that kind of bribery, to explain in detail the Chairman's Office is called. Finally, sitting there high-paid lawyers.
Addendum on 12/Sept/10: explain Above all, the President why he wants to hide behind them.
Chancellor as a former system operators in the East presents a concealed power politics, reminiscent of the SED. With their "preferred candidate" for the presidential office, as she said later of the public, although the Minister Christina van was Leyen, the costly state office, in terms of damage as a waste of money, as superfluous as never before in the history of the Federal Republic .
Addendum 13/Sept/10 Dissatisfaction with President Wulff grows
like a mirror-covered online article. By the term a "kind of corruption" in taxpayers' money has still not got one. After all, the lagging Opposition to the Internet desk vRhein behind already. In the article appear on the following terms: "golden handshake", "assistance for a Hetzer", "Deal", "Sarrazin gets rich by agitation and receives appear even more assistance from the Federal Presidential Office," "at the expense of the taxpayer a Deal "SPD leader Gabriel told the Bild am Sonntag newspaper:" Now pay the federal bench Mr. Sarrazin probably a lot of money that he goes so we know these methods from the private sector. ".
only timid one works on a "deal thrown away the taxpayers' approach. Meanwhile, reportedly from the Federal Presidential Office, it was a matter between the Treaty partners Sarrazin and the Bundesbank. Since almost no one knows from the opposition, who owns the Federal Bank, its creation of money and loans actually, it gets difficult, the effort to constantly suffering "tax payers", took place at the expense of the deal. If it is not clear who owns the money of the Bundesbank actually, it is even unclear whether it is in this case is a victim of the taxpayer. The taxpayer has to do at first sight to be unconnected with the Bundesbank, apparently - according to popular opinion - may be printed as needed money, though agreed with the ECB.
given the following: With the euro, the Bundesbank obeys a different command structure, not the state of their own, Government and parliament, but the requirements of the ECB, which operates without states, because it is not yet the European Public. Therefore watch over currencies, money creation, interest and loans representing bankers, who are appointed out of the States, if you think they are qualified. European monetary policy can not determine more states, but bankers. You have the "business" now in the hand.
How does the money but now? What the tax payer has to do with the ECB? Money has become a commodity, no longer just a means of payment. The commodity money is aligned with the demand. More credit needs of the economy make it to the private person more money to satisfy the Demand is printed, if the circulation is sufficient. The clever part is that the money will now be freely traded. After equivalents, such as gold, is not asked. Needs and the question: How much is it worth the money? - Is crucial. So that the economy can not simply pluck money like fruit from the tree, the money has its price. You must contact the intermediate distributor, these are the banks that provide loans and have to be careful that they are repaid on time, at interest of course. Interest is therefore necessary to hang the fruits of higher
Note 1. Quite so simple should not be raising money. The inter-dealer-banks must also check whether a borrower will be able to fulfill its obligation.
Because money was commodity, it is to play poker for money as the goods to play poker for real value. Banks always offer more incentives, long-term yields because up to high-risk securities which bring more but can also ruin.
When the Federal Bank Mr. Sarrazin 1000 € extra charge, which is then solely for the Bundesbank or the pension fund affected? The first message was such that the pension fund was affected. There was talk of a pension increase of 1000 €. After my post above, which came first, the Chairman's Office is seeking desperately to the statement from the 1000 € higher Pensions are going to push and pass the buck to the federal bench. So we have in this office the process that first Wulff the buck to his colleague Rod pushed further, then this the same buck then passes to the federal bench. This seems at first glance, the pension fund not to be affected. Rather, it seems to appear after the new version now includes an additional pension to act by the Bundesbank, but only for the moment.
Such additional pension is awarded, the Bundesbank, for she is no longer masters of their own, but is subject to the command structure of the ECB. Not one euro must be uncontrollably away somewhere, buttered forgive. The Bundesbank is not empowered. So then it is only the pension fund, which will be charged. The Federal Bank has no such thing as supplementary pensions. Your only job is to money, in agreement with the ECB "sell" to banks, so money is sold is a commodity. Incidentally, the Bundesbank may still invest safely in order to increase its volume. In no case, but it may make for free, let alone a pension supplement.
What came today from the Federal Presidential Office, is a slide-excuse.
The opposition still lagged far behind, so that the terminus of a type of "corruption" has not yet appeared there. In the Chairman's office you have taken the risk but so, because this blog "President" is read there, for sure. Because of this a shift. The opposition argued not so dangerous, confused and rather lax, here with me the whole danger was already apparent. It led to the described slide-or-crook excuse for any kind of corruption would be a disaster for the President.
The Bundesbank can not be a "Treaty partner" of Mr. Sarrazin, as the Federal Presidential Office wants to do in the meantime now believe he is paid by the state, not by the Bundesbank. The Rogue of the excuse adjourn partners Sarrazin / Bundesbank has burst.
What about the money but with the Bundesbank. Can they handle it in abundance? May give the impression that so much money that a small pension OBTAINING one Sarrazin plays no role. He can but he is wrong.
The money is printed as required goods on behalf of the ECB and in strict accord with national and international banks reserves, its market value to the cent. When it comes to the private and semi-public state banks into human hands, it is equipped with repayment obligations and interest. Repayments have to be worked out. At the periphery there is a kind of reconciliation between capital and labor or service, for without which there is none. More than the casino. But there are also the addiction does not to stop making the casino owners to regularly winners. In the money economy, there are casino-style bets that allow occasional high profits through work and achievement are not possible. But the risk of losing everything, is also there. In politics, there are the speeches and authoritarian Come play poker with risk-papers in national banks - also the addiction to "save" with the camouflage country and federal budgets, and absolutely everything was lost. The suppliers of goods Devirate from the United States could not seize as quickly and put together, as in Europe and was specifically requested in Germany, with increasing greed and limitless addiction symptoms, so that the packages the Devirate, over a long period of content could be worthless. More, more was required - and it was delivered, to the disillusionment.
We have noted that at the periphery, where companies and people, the money put into circulation has a jealously eyeing commercial value and slides into work and effort into it. Remuneration for work and power is taxed. The flow of money in circulation flows in part from, as in a side-stream of the State, including the pension funds. Since the commercial value is then.
pensions and supplementary pensions, the higher by 1000 € of Mr. Sarrazin will be worn over the flow of money of the state because it is
past performance, concerns
past work. The performance, which is the 1,000-euro increase for Mr. Sarrazin were taken there in the past is not. Sarrazin has done nothing for it. The amount, because now no one comes around it, including the Chairman's Office is not the crook-like, bribe money, I said, this kind of a settlement is not. Then Bundesbank had as Presidential Office set value before my criticism - that terrible word "bribe" - stood in the room, which was to provide Mr. Sarrazin
in no case any severance . This directive came from no less a person than the Chancellor (the occupied once again that she does everything wrong at first). Corporate funds supported Compensation may be in order, carried by the State severance pay are not, because the public is harmed by exactly the amount.
money is on the periphery of a very closely eyeing commercial value and can be exchanged for anything. If a penny paid too little, it falls on already. How is the value reached it? Since I already feel like the top had to write about it, I would like to add something here. Monetary value and are determined by the credit demand. The debt-making is determining. Because it is mostly paid for money because then the social demand for money is obvious. He need not be calculated. The readiness for money to pay money, shows the degree of how urgent it is needed. In most cases this will be worked in addition, companies have to work so that profits can cover the repayments, innovations must be present for loans generate profits.
But how is it with the money saved is located on the high edge, which was either saved some inherited or difficulty of the mouth, which was purchased in the case of companies with a dangerous loss of time, which includes, for example in China dictatorial assets policy, in the case of financial jugglers is stashed in tax havens? These reserves have their values also from the credit side, the urgent need of companies and people who risk debt and are stressed for longer have to work for it or implement innovations. How nice for the savers! You gain without work, without power, which is up to them in the past. They have resisted temptation, have waived, or have just saved the money market risks everything -. And now they benefit from it
would save all the rest would hurry and money are not needed so urgently, then would decrease its commercial value. This would, however, the desires, the consumer needs that Credit needs to increase again. There is a natural, more recently global balance that again and again levels off and is connected with human nature, even with the dualism of the sexes. On the global balance, I had repeatedly pointed to had not the reckless faith of wasteful politicians oppose to limitless debt-making at the end to be shouldered, merging with a liberating inflation or something like that - I was wrong .
profit Some of the money, others want credit, both small and global, with people like countries. Who wants to professionally benefit from the money, makes something, the thing is not so simple. Skills, computer skills, years of experience are required. This can not everyone. Again, the grapes are not too deep. To know more people who had bought as telecom stocks, watched as a gentleman summer with private planes and luxury has been provided, and as the shares then went into the cellar. Benefit do a lot to gain a few. If Sarrazin but will benefit because people steal on levers of power and other people's money zuschanzen him to solve their own mistakes and to cover up a problem. Therefore, I had spoken of a "kind of bribe." The matter is still reprehensible as a bribe.
should actually federal Wulff therefore take his hat. A new edition of
Hat Fashion in Schloss Bellevue I will not, however. The small light above the main is already enough. Merkel made the light hair dryer, as I said from.
Addendum on 15/Oktober/10 here "smuggled" Without light, all in the dark, Wulff was concerned about his advantage as he is to elect the federal president presented. Actually, he should have to resign his office for this election as Minister-President of Lower Saxony, to be free. The risk did not go into it. He clung to the claims from his post as Minister-President, could choose from a post in the other. The man stuck in the money, stick to the personal advantage. Character to have is something quite different. His opponent Gauck has character. He has proven this. Wulff has chair-adhesive on the ass, sorry - the expression.
Addendum 15/Sept/10 The role of Bundespräsidial-Office is getting worse, the more comes to light
.
If the font is too small for the blog, it helps to hold down the control key and + keys. Addendum 14/Sept/10 Just in time, nearly matched as it appears, an article in Spiegel Online on two debt-free municipalities in North Rhine alone go on a limb in the middle of other towns and cities, that debt into the billions. Quote:
Many communities have simply verhoben financially. Provincial politicians squander millions on oversized prestige projects such as water parks or business parks that nobody needs. Add to that the inability of some overburdened counselors, correctly deal with public money. In the offices will be wheeling and dealing going and gemauschelt, but also slept simply a hope, the taxpayers.
Good! Behind the alleged "over-lifting" lies almost always the octopus corruption. The economic criminals benefited from the debt that is at the expense of citizens. This must be added together. Nevertheless, I love this book
!
And what is the alternative? Two debt-free municipalities are presented
Reken with Mayor Heinz Seier , CDU, and
Raesfeld with the party-less Mayor Andreas Grote Dorst . Reken has now even a few million on the high edge, debt services can forget and even earned interest. A greeting to you, you good!, VRhein from the writing workshop. Seier with a wish-chancellor would be identified. He does everything right, the incompetent Merkel somehow makes everything wrong. A party-political be applauded Federal President, Chancellor Merkel of weggelobt part of this. And now begins to have been the man with sloping money-jacking, in the case Sarrazin, it will not then also a coward, what a contrast to Mayor Heiner Win (
me of my father's former friend , the bass singer
Heinz Hagenau recalls)!
17/Sept/10 Addendum: After these good examples, one a great singer at the highest international level for decades, the Federal Cross of Merit, various prices, Titurel in Bayreuth, home lots on many world stages, and next to a deeply humane social involvement in trade union and SPD, the other a mayor with an iron will to succeed down the line, a credit balance of his congregation on the high edge, not in debt like everyone else, no wastage, the welfare its citizens in the eye - and now again in contrast
CDU scandal, this time by Christian Wulff, now President. The details I had noticed very early on that he is the highest German official is not so good, now you landed blow after blow to documents. Former Prime Minister Professor Biedenkopf, it may feel particularly bad that this man is the presidential election of civil rights leader Joachim Gauck prevented (and the way it has downgraded its Gauck, the more it is not, Wulff, therefore, a cooperation was possible only in this one area, a bottomless arrogant impudence, I mean).
again has been the Internet desk vRhein of truth as
first publication instance on the track. Self-confidence I can say, yes, this writing workshop here now a quiet attention instance, unpaid, exploited, often of better quality, more than those who dig here and are based employment reasons, want to pick up a foreseen trend, want to pick up accents without the copyright to respect. Here in the Writing workshop originally created by thought texts immediately following current events. For latest happenings, there is no literature. The writing workshop produced such hard on the events in the context of university education, their own research work, funded by the DFG, and in the context of professional self-employment (pre-press and publishing). Sufficient spectrum for good discernment is thus provided. Latest news
be quoted or linked. This is followed by the commentary column, often with an image on top satire. Another feature of the Internet desk is vRhein the quick response and the wealth of their own thought Text in an information age that has made copying easier.
copy somewhere can anyone who knows about something with computers. The issue Copied as his own is usually the next step. Here in the writing workshop vRhein arise in the ocean of the original copy of his own hand, as if on a small island in the ocean, dealing with the current political and social life. Even the selection of bright news, messages or substantive reports indicates a weight, their relevance is confirmed by the rule. In all that I need to make occasional attention, because reading today increasingly difficult. Those who read carefully and interpret it remains possible are hard to find.
Example 1 as the Internet desk argues The power supply of nuclear power plants is easy to destroy, because it lies outside the protective sheaths. This
experts have found . Terrorists had an easy game. A nuclear meltdown was inevitable. The government is not responding.
A German government should urgently respond: No new version of nuclear power plants, no life extension - the terrorist threat is now even a new situation. The energy demand can be compensated for a) the statutory limitation the energy consumption, only so many available to everyone, and way-way renewable energy sources that are safe, b) a referendum: Do you want the risk of such a vulnerability to disasters, succession? c) May not cost anything, it will be solved by the vRhein'sche gravity Policy (power, drag, balance) d) a lottery with an increased hit rate is created e) the national survey will be accompanied by profit opportunities . The commitment of the population is safe, the questioning has cost nothing, but patriotism was aroused and practice-based democracy.
Addendum 21/Sept/10 1:22 +7 Oh yeah?
Gabriel calls referendum on nuclear power? causing it precisely after my brief paragraph from the top, exactly 4 days thereafter, the typical time interval, which I know already? And every four years, election-democracy is not enough? It also implemented the same?
presented in a recent interview Gabriel clearly the responsibilities of the nuclear power plant safety and directed in-house professional opposition to Chancellor Merkel, who apparently wants to avoid clearly defined laws, and four major groups and the energy operators zuschanze 100 billion profits, where only 30,000 workers the 300,000 workers in the mid-size alternative energy sector are facing. The alternative energy industry may have to face strong competitive disadvantage. It will be interesting to opposition complaints to the Federal Constitutional Court.
Example 2, as the Internet desk argues Messages:
The Marriage of Figaro Westerwelle;
The love affair of von Beust with a boy . The Pope in England
, the abuse scandals.
What does the writing workshop vRhein daaaazu now? Gay marriage, boys-love - filled the popular press, suggests to people is to talk about, the rest shows the quite innocuous facets of our society, they may not be so important. Laugh when the Bild newspaper together the terminology of the original marriage, love, the woman and man, so that a private event is crowned by society, if this terminology is transmitted 1:1 to the gay marriage. It sounds funny and is so fun - more of a profit, certainly not a loss.
Why should not gays lead times harmonious marriages that lead as Rose in wars like husband / wife / marriage?
sexuality, the flea circus is, in society in all
winds of chance and development-stage-dependent, moody, with virtually all other factors except of sound mind. She lays a boring pauses when the stomach to digest fat and too much food must be expected, however, a fancy fireworks, when the stomach with light meals, salads, fruit and the like has been spared, was that power potential, such as automatically slips in the abdomen. So why on these headlines, the flea, not ignore?
makes up to a certain degree of diversity from the scattered and the attractive
social stimulus. Within the diversity divide human error, laws and penalties the field. Virtues and vices, great and wicked, crime and integrity to each other. Where are the political and social responsibilities? I think, not only in the legislation, which seems to control everything and it can not, but in the early detection of human development. For example, separate sets of parents early in the dispute and, moreover, they left deep wounds in children that are harmed in their development. And what are the positive components of human development at all of humanity? In long-lasting trust, no matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual relationships. Of trust and closeness resulting force, especially when it is embedded and sexuality. But whence comes the
original force? From the intensity the love of potential parent-couples even before birth, then, especially during pregnancy and at least three years thereafter. During this time, real love relationships creates the potential power of the people. Are born that way and the early years, equipped with basic trust can develop good, qualified later to develop load-bearing properties, which are so important in a society. State and society have thus the task of creating the conditions for and provide appropriate support. It lies in peace, in at least modest prosperity and in many components of freedom in order to spread opportunities for people who look to their future and for some . Do
The church, especially the Catholic lies too deep in the foul swamp of the child-abuse and acolytes to have a say here right now. But the immaculate DEHismus can jump in, yes. This is an orientation, as in the last paragraph above. Well successful parent-pairs are
this orientation. A society is well advised to align them
, and not to send half-measures from the sexual flea circus in the political responsibility. Let exception to the Bible, then it is the couple Mary and Joseph, which is probably one of the pillars of humanity, they should have actually lived, what
for courageous investigations not sure is . But should also include non-natural Immaculata be doubted.
The Internet desk vRhein holds so have philosophical axioms, to be able to comment properly or satirize the events and to define social ways.
_______________________
note1 interest may, however, a disproportionate burden, or help a disproportionate wealth. Therefore it would be wise, I think, add to the interest and compound interest which revocation component that made dynamic may be, which need not be serious, but noticeable. Life itself, the nature wins, by the component of the withering away of the old in strength for the New gains by the power of new life. Even money is likely not a theoretical, rigid, lifeless his trade well. A slow decrease in interest income would be enough. A state tax would be robbery. The wrong way. A slight decline inherent component of the interest income would be correct. The energy of money would receive would be even increased, comparable to the falling leaves of trees in tropical countries, which fertilizes the soil and do it continuously.
_______________________
Addendum on 3:10:10, after the speech of the President of German unity. The German language has the feelings of draped word "unity", not to be confused with the unit. There was the meaning of the word, it almost never, or agreement has been enforced, as with the Nazis. It is also contrary to democratic diversity. It may be that there is a vague consensus can relate to the constitution and the Basic Law. But already in the sport and shares, despite sea of flags, because the opposing team is hailed by others. Can therefore be no national unity recipe or concept. The reality resists unification or unity of a few. We see it in Stuttgart. Unity is the disgusting warm and emotional pressure from the right hands. Whose hand is given, to be collected from them. Takes a back hand, from a concentration camp, then developed once the company. Talk of BP Wulff suffers from collecting, generalizations. How many Muslume had written for now, for it is the BP of the BP? Not long ago
, as was the President of the Turkish Muslims Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Horst Köhler.
The speech was wishful thinking. The only nebulous understood word "unity" as a synonym for "unit" was advertised as a hymn, at the beginning and end of the speech. But it contradicts the concept of diversity in the same speech. It contained not a single concrete thought. "We are one people" is not one, not be true. All with a German passport are German, that's more likely, would be the same. Findings, even if they argued emphatically fall back on their objectivity, when smoke and mirrors are gone. truant children must be able to speak German when they come to school, was not allowed. In it, I can see no concept. One approach would be to let the school two years will begin earlier, or even three years so that language barriers fall by itself, because the children the right age together, namely when they learn languages more easily with each other. Another approach would be neat school uniforms, each class or stage in a different color. They were a simple way to produce a family-community feeling among the children, no matter where they come from. - Easy to say, we are a country that has offered the way to the East Prussian territories of Russia in 1990 pushed lack of interest aside, this is not enough, which has no substance.
"I am also president of the Muslims" said Wulff. He weighted. But there are many other religions and attitudes in Germany, apart from Christians and Jews. She mentioned he did not. This consolidated Wulff, the Islamic conquest of Europe and the latent priority of Sharia in the Islamic organizations, on the running board of Germany.
(Addendum) The Islamic scholar Gerd-Rüdiger Puin threw the (apparently not been informed vRhein Note) Head of State "wishful thinking" before: "The whole debate is unrealistic because there is no critical attitude towards Islam in Germany," said he is the "Saarbrücken Zeitung. In this country, is hardly anything known about the contents of Islam, such that he is "programmatically against the separation of church and state" defense. quote from Spiegel Online of 6/Oktober/10.
As President it is obligated to the other not to drop under the table.
He must look for spiritual content, not just members numbers. He may also get the added DEHismus expect (a person), I mean easily amused. Who, however, studied the DEHismus, which could begin to have doubts as to whether Islam is the right way, with all due respect for believers of any direction, thus also to conflicting beliefs within Islam, but not to contrary belief-perpetrators of such directions, which occurred off the kill the world stage by using suicide bombers against one another, say, to sneaky way innocent pilgrims, wedding guests, Praying tear, etc. and maim. Who the "Euro-Islam", however, holds lands, also with only one person, almost only, Bassam Tibi.
Addendum on 5/Oktober/10: INFILTRATION WITHIN THE INSIDE OF ISLAM generally be made against infiltration and integration, instead of by the Federal President naive desired integration will not happen the desired infiltration of German society with the result that more and more German convert to Islam, with the further consequence that such an impressive number of recruited jihadists is. Some of these German Islamists
were just yesterday / today killed by a combat drone. Others are sent against their own country on the path.
Thus arrives what I had long predicted that the world finds itself in a gradually increasing world war. The violence of this process has to do with an inner INFILTRATION within Islam. This infiltration means that the Koran as the actual proclamation of Allah to the families, including the German Muslim families, such a doctrine is taken in, in a way that doubt be punished with sanctions such as trapped against "infidels." Or is it them eternal damnation is threatened, which can be accomplished here on earth already. The fear among Muslims is increasing, especially the control of Islamists. This control corresponds already a Stasi or Gestapo.
President Christian Wulff would like to agree, especially regarding his wishes. Only the truly stupid ones, the half-idiot, the CDU / CSU for their re-election as a "people's party" so desperately needed, will follow the One-wishes of the President and take shelter with him. The President forgot to mention the storm that covers Germany.
_______________________
Addendum on 6/Oktober/2010 Chancellor Merkel
justifies the assumptions Wulff and the sentence "I am also the President of the Muslims." Wulff has certainly presented its patron, the speech before. You must include Merkel when she is criticized. Merkel makes first ever all factually wrong, before they can then cajoled and usually yields the greatest pressure, the industry lobby, the banks, etc., and he had found the Internet desk repeatedly.
What was the problem for now this time? What was wrong with the set of Wulff / Merkel, he (Wulff) was also the President of the Muslims? In the press were voices that strove with this Ausage. But no one found the logical error, I see. Nevertheless, the first action / action The Chancellor is always wrong, this law can not be broken so easily. So think it means. What the error was please?
The error is immediately clear when the sentence is changed. "I am the president of all citizens with a German passport and a little bit also for those who still do not have." Thus, the statement would be correct. They correspond to a state that separates religion. This is required by the Basic Law.
Wulff / Merkel mind mixing religion and state with each other and are just taken in by pressing the line of Islam, which demands exactly that, namely that the state and Islam must be connected. Why was the sentence: "I am also President of the Muslims "instead of" I am the president of all Germans, whatever religion they feel belongs to private. I am the President of the German citizen. "
But not the Muslims Allah is the" Päsident "of Muslims, though, no one else. The identity of a person as his private-Muslim thing. His identity as a citizen with a German Pass is vital for a president. As a citizen, he is the Basic Law, the Constitution and general laws required. As a private man can he believe what he wants, but the state has adopted the Religious Freedom. A secular state, we have, therefore, may not Religion lift. The wrong emphasis in the Wulff / Merkel's speech goes against the constitution. The error of Wulff / Merkel was to have violated the Basic Law. In it they call for "unity", I think it!
Please "and" think away the top of the title!
_______________________
Addendum on 9/Oktober/2010 Criticism of Wulff's speech continues.
Kauder criticized the sentence: "Islam is also one of Germany" and pointed out the other traditional German values-order. Wulff, however, made a statement about Islam and not to Germany. Better, therefore, the wording would have been: "Islam exists in Germany. "
Even German courts contact the legal sense of the Muslims and pull apart Sharia law approached her. Existence is not to deny it is there. The membership of Germany must not be discussed now . So, you better wait another fifty years to prove whether Islam can be fused with the value system in Germany or not. Wulff wants "fatherly" it. That was wrong, unnecessary and premature. It must not link the Islam , citizen, however, already, even if they are Muslims.
